Why do the most disgusting people always decide they should be the poster child for a cause?
What an unfortunate child… What an unfortunate baby’s daddy 
I guess she is proving that pro-choice can be for the sake of the fetus, not just the mother.
PS: I do think it should be up to women to decide this issue, but I am definitely not being serious about it being okay to kill babies. (FYI for the sensitive people of the Internet)
(No Ratings Yet)Tags: abortion, awkward, baby, image, mom, nasty, parent, pregnant, pro-choice
July 25th, 2008 at 7:46 am
Beauty is only a six pack and a light switch away…
July 25th, 2008 at 9:08 am
I’d do her…
August 18th, 2008 at 10:48 am
well why’d u say it, if you didn’t mean it?
August 27th, 2008 at 3:58 am
Go to Priests for Life and look at partial birth abortions, then click on what they do with the babies parts, brains, and inner workings and who buys and sells them for legal “research”…Obama okayed this! One photo has baby in the fifth month inside his mom trying to hold the hand of the doctor who is sucking out his brains with an instrument to kill him…
I am NOT VOTING FOR THIS and you can call me all the names you want.
There are thousands of people who want babies and cannot have them and have to go to foreign nations and pay exhorbitant sums just to have one alive and raise it. IF you cannot see that Liberal judges okay this
(Obama wants them all) then you are part of the problem, not the solution…M.O. mother of three, and Godmother of five that could have been aborted, but through family intervention and volunteerism are still alive and loved in families…
Margaret
October 12th, 2008 at 7:45 pm
wow margret a great post
i think abortion is wronge also.
idk who would want this but
i am fifteen and i got prenant i would not want to keep it
its herd to look at it from both angles.
October 13th, 2008 at 12:13 pm
@ Margaret, bay
The baby doesn’t know what’s happening. We are not even sure if the baby is intelligent enough to even know what’s going on. A good amount of families cannot afford healthcare and a portion of families can’t even afford the amenities that the baby needs. You need to look at the logical side of the issue, not the moral side. I know, morals are important to maintain a just society, but the baby (I am guessing) would much rather be euthanized than live in a bad household. Plus, take overpopulation. Sure, it’s gradual, but with the ever dwindling natural resources, a couple of pureed dead babies (ha ha dead baby joke) won’t make a difference. Scientifically, this is practical. Economically, this is practical. Morality? That’s the only factor that comes into play here. Your choice is your choice, but I say pro choice.
(Abortions are very cheap, unless you want to do it “for free”. I have a coat hanger right here.)
(The morality issue is mostly spearheaded by religion. Go to almost any abortion clinic and you’ll see a couple of religious wing-nuts protesting out in front.)
(You think this is a problem? This is a minor issue compared to what’s going on in the world right now.)
@ bay
I am 15 also, and I know that looking at both angles are hard to look at. If you got pregnant you wouldn’t want to keep it. It depends entirely on the mother.
@ Margaret
A majority of babies are aborted at early stages of pregnancy. Only rarely do they abort late babies. Also, think about it: the baby’s mother has to give consent in order for scientists to use the baby for research. If not, then it would be a terrible crime. That is a clear case of pro-choice. I think that anti-abortionists are slightly irrational to not look at the big picture when it comes to the well-being of the baby.
October 13th, 2008 at 12:16 pm
@ Margaret
Are you voting for McCain? I respect your choice. FYI, McCain only uses the religious right as something to fluff his vote count. McCain don’t give a f**k. Mavericks don’t give a f**k. Yee haw.